(Written mid February, 2013)
When I began
this research, I thought I had some idea of what it meant to be a feminist; I
had an inkling of what it meant to be an artist, an arts activist; I also had a
vague idea of the content of pornography, mostly from overhearing my younger
brothers interact with their mates around our kitchen table. What I hadn’t
considered was the extent to which this research would influence my life.
Writing a reflexive piece, outside of the comforts of academic rigour, is daunting.
Until this point, I have managed to separate my private life and art life
reasonably neatly. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the two
must come together – art as life as art –; that despite my fears it is time to
drop my guard and engage fully, in order to maintain the critical integrity
required.
I began writing
this piece because I haven’t shaved my legs for forty-two days. Reading outside
one afternoon, (a hugely inspirational book Art
and Activism in the Age of Globalisation), it dawned on me: I am twenty six,
and this is the longest I have ever been without shaving my legs. I have been
dutifully trimming my ‘excess body hair’ since I was thirteen and some girl in
the high school canteen queue told me my hairy legs were disgusting. At that stage, I was already too fat, too tall,
and too strong to be sexy, so the hair had to go! For just over half my life
I’ve been shaving and waxing, without much thought, but with an underlying
sense of stress about belonging. On top of routine maintenance, every important
event, every milestone, each birthday even, was preceded by a ritualistic
removal of body hair. Because I am a woman. Because that’s what women do.
This new hair
growth was unplanned – initially we were camping and ‘maintenance’ wasn’t
practical – but became a conscious decision soon after. I have been observing
the effects with a growing consciousness, changes in myself perception and in
other’s perceptions of me. At the moment, I am lucky. I am immersed in a
community of likeminded folk– my hairy legs (the phrase still brings a curl of
disgust to my lips!) are symbolic of a conscious choice, of belonging, of a
shared subversion of cultural norms. It is not too much of a stretch for these
folk to conceive of a woman with body hair, and it comes as no surprise as I
identify with other cultural ‘outsiders’, being queer and an artist.
My lover also
has body hair which makes it easier; I’ve always found it sexy on her. She is the first, though, in a fairly long
list of lovers, to resist the societal dictations around personal pruning.
Maybe that’s what I find attractive about it; the subversive nature of the act
is appealing. However, it has taken me eighteen months to become comfortable
with her unabashedly hairy legs and armpits in public. Whilst she was (or at
the very least appeared to be) at ease, a small part of me was embarrassed,
ashamed that others might not think my lover was attractive. Of course this was
foolish - she is both gorgeous and true to herself. Nevertheless, I’ve found it
is possible to be conscious of normalising cultural confines and their agendas,
and still be subjected to them. My hair humiliation was further compounded by
an acute awareness of my fear driven inability to step beyond my socialisation.
Despite my aesthetic
anxiety, I have never shied away from the term ‘feminist’. My lover is one
amongst many who surprised me with their deep-rooted reservations at the use of
the term, associating it with misandry and hairy-lesbian communes (oh, the
irony). It has been an inspiring journey
delving into feminist history. The artists and activists, the lovers, mothers,
sisters, aunts and grandmothers, the powerful, independent, self-aware women in
the generations before mine had so much courage. They pushed boundaries, speaking out and protesting,
putting their own bodies on the line to get society to where we are today. But
what they have achieved is not yet enough! The speakers at recent exhibitions
and seminars, particularly the art focussed Feminist
Futures (MoMA 2007) and the Wack! retrospective(2008),
many of whom have been actively participating in Feminism since the 1960s all
uttered the same message: the battle is not yet won - the new generation needs
to critically engage and build on their foundations.
And there are
those who will, who do fight, but it is easier said than done! There appears to
be a general belief (frustratingly prominent amongst the young women in my
life) that we don’t need feminism anymore – that we have equal rights. Even
when this myth is exposed, again and again, the levels of apathy are often overwhelming.
Despite easily accepting my mildly alternative appearance, the communities I
move in seem uninterested in opening many spaces for feminist discourse; the
queer community has its own battle for equality to deal with first, and many of the performers and
artists (consciously or not) are invested in a patriarchal status-quo. The
revival of burlesque, pole-dancing as sport and pin-up girls also limit the
capacity for critical discussion. Many of them are extremely talented
performers, who are aware of the societal scaffolding in which they operate, claiming their performance of femininity as a
positive and empowering - actively choosing to be the object of desire, or
making ridicule of it with daring strip tease performances which push
proprietary boundaries. Even so, when
they’re up on stage, the audience – myself included- rarely engages with those
politics. I’m certainly complicit within my art practice to some extent; one –segregated-
part of my practice involves painting on the skin of nearly nude models, the
majority of whom are women. Like the burlesque girls, it is a calculated
complicity, fraught with ethical and practical issues I’m still trying to
resolve.
Aesthetic valuation
as a primary measure of a woman’s worth, especially in our consumer driven
society, is a problem which seems often criticised but rarely countered, and I
understand why. It is hard to see the way forward. This was demonstrated at a
Masters Graduate Exhibition by Lisa Waldner which I attended, entitled I want to be a forensic scientist playboy
bunny; sadly the punch of the title encapsulated the content of the show,
which demonstrated the contradictions in contemporary ‘female’ experience, but
did little to offer any solutions. It was frustrating to hear the tired
rhetoric of her female interviewees: the pressure they felt, the physical
attributes they identified as sexy, their simultaneous awareness of and
subjectivity to the construction of femininity. I hazard resistance seems
futile in the capitalist economy where even the subversive act of displaying
‘real women’ has become a marketing campaign to sell more products. The
exhibition displayed the findings of the research in bland domesticity
(inherently female?!); scribbled thoughts on brown paper, magazine cut outs and
fluorescent post-its, already fading under the lights, and a short video -
animated typography overlaid with sound clips from the artist’s interviews. The
typical response in this video to the f-word? Something about hairy, too hairy, and armpits stimulated a wave
of self-conscious nausea in my singlet and shorts - despite my own criticisms
of the act of buying in, it seems I’m not immune just yet.
Disclosing
this information feels like an act of activism, as much as it feels like part
of a performance. As much as it may be both of those things, it is also the
musings of a twenty six year old woman coming to terms with a feminist legacy
which is so vast it is hard to avoid paralysis in the wake of its esteem, and
struggling within the dictated norms of contemporary society. It’s as honest as
I dare to be - at this point, it feels like the first small step toward a
feminist-art-activist-practice/life.
No comments:
Post a Comment